HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2024 FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE SESSION

The Florida Legislature convened the 2024 Regular Session in Tallahassee on January 9 and adjourned on March 8. During those 60 days, lawmakers filed a total of 1,902 bills of which only 325 passed. Within the newly passed bills, several provide changes to land development and environmental practice areas, as well as to the rights of developers, homebuilders, and landowners.

 

Below are summaries of these important bills. For more information, please contact us.

 

Advertising Platforms Now Required to Collect and Remit Taxes for Vacation Rental Advertisements and Vacation Rentals Required to Register with Local Governments

 

Senate Bill 280 now requires advertising platforms to collect and remit taxes for listing vacation rentals that are owned, operated or managed by the advertising platform, as well as those that are solely listed to be advertised or rented but owned by others. Also, local governments may now create local ordinances requiring vacation rentals to be registered and obtain rental licenses to operate transient rentals within the local government jurisdictions. A temporary license may be issued while the registration application is pending. Failure to comply with the registration requirements may result in suspension and revocation of a rental license, as well as accrual of fines. These fines may become a lien on real property, other than homestead property. If signed by the Governor, this bill will take effect on July 1, 2024, except as otherwise expressly provided.

 

 

Local Governments Can Use a Mobility Plan as an Alternative Transportation Study and Impact Fees Must Be Allocated to County or Municipality When

No Interlocal Agreement Exists

 

House Bill 479 requires interlocal agreements when both counties and municipalities charge developers impact fees. If there is no interlocal agreement, then there must be an allocation between both the municipality and county for collecting and remitting those impact fees. If a local agreement adopts an alternative transportation system, holders of any transportation or road impact fee credits existing before the adoption of the alternative transportation system are entitled to the full benefit of the intensity and density prepaid by the credit balance as of the date the alternative transportation system was first established. If signed by the Governor, this bill will take effect on October 1, 2024.

 

 

Statutes Amended Requiring Continuing Education for HOA Managers,

Audited Financial Statements to be Available, and Items that Cannot be Precluded

by HOA Governing Documents

 

House Bill 1203 requires homeowners association (“HOA”) managers to attend at least one meeting (member or board) annually. HOA managers are required to have no more than 10 hours of continuing education to renew their license. Biannually, at least five hours must pertain specifically to HOA’s and three hours must relate to recordkeeping. Official records of HOA’s must be maintained for at least seven years and be available on the HOA’s website. Protected information included within the official records, such as records protected by lawyer-client privilege or personnel records of association management, must be redacted if it cannot be viewed by parcel owners. Members of an HOA may be charged with a misdemeanor or felony if they alter or destroy HOA accounting documents. HOA’s must comply with subpoenas and provide official records when requested. HOA’s must provide financial statements and those financial statements must be audited if the HOA has 1,000 or more parcels. Debit cards are prohibited to be used to pay for HOA items. Lawful parking on owner’s property cannot be precluded by the HOA. Also, HOA’s cannot preclude improvements to property when the improvements are out of sight from neighbors and community areas. HB 1203 also states requirements for providing notices relating to violations and fines. If the violations are cured before an official meeting, then no fines or suspensions may be levied. If signed by the Governor, this bill will take effect on July 1, 2024.

 

 

Missing Middle Ad Valorem Property Tax Program Amended under the

Live Local Act to Allow Some Local Taxing Authorities to Opt Out of the Program

 

As we previously reported, House Bill 7073 amended the “Missing Middle” ad valorem property tax exemption program to allow local taxing authorities to “opt out” of the program for qualifying units within the 80% of Area Median Income (“AMI”) and 120% AMI bracket if the local taxing authority is within a metropolitan statistical area with a surplus of affordable housing at the 80% AMI-120% AMI level per the University of Florida’s Shimberg Center for Housing Studies Annual Report. In order for the taxing authority to opt out, the governing body of the taxing authority must adopt an ordinance or resolution to opt out, which must be approved by a 2/3 vote. The opt out ordinance or resolution would take effect on the January 1 immediately succeeding the adoption and expires on the second January 1 after the January 1 in which the ordinance or resolution took effect. There is a grandfathering provision to grandfather units within multifamily projects that already received the exemption from the local property appraiser prior to the opt out ordinance or resolution. In addition to the opt out program, House Bill 7073 modified the number of units to qualify for the program if the project is within an area of critical state concern. These projects can qualify for the tax exemption program so long as the project contains more than 10 units dedicated to affordable housing meeting the 80% AMI or 120% AMI threshold. For projects outside of an area of critical state concern, the minimum set aside is still 71 units. House Bill 7073 also requires the local property appraiser to include the unit’s proportionate share of the residential common areas, including the land, that are fairly attributable to the unit. It also allows the local property appraiser to request additional information in order to process the application. The Governor signed HB 7073 on May 7, 2024. The opt out program will take effect on July 1, 2024, but all other changes are retroactive to January 1, 2024.

 

 

Live Local Act Land Use Administrative Approval Process Amended 

 

Like Senate Bill 102 from the 2023 Legislative Session, Senate Bill 328 requires local governments to administratively approve multifamily and mixed use residential projects if 40% of the residential units are rental units restricted to affordable housing for at least 30 years. If the project is mixed use residential, SB 328 now prohibits local governments from restricting the floor area ratio (“FAR”) below 150% of the highest currently allowed FAR under the jurisdiction’s land development regulations. SB 328 also allows projects to have a mixture of for sale and rental units, so long as the required 40% of units restricted to affordable housing are rental. SB 328 modified the maximum height for projects adjacent to, on two or more sides, a parcel or parcels zoned for single-family residential use with at least 25 contiguous homes to 150% of the tallest building within ¼ mile of the proposed development or 3 stories, whichever is higher. Projects that are within ¼ mile of a military installation, within ¼ mile laterally from the runway edge and within an area that is the width of ¼ mile extended at right angles from the end of the runway for a distance of 10,000 feet of any existing airport runway or planned airport runway, or within an airport noise zone are prohibited from using the administrative approval process. Projects that may be adversely affected by the changes to SB 102 through SB 328 may be grandfathered under SB 102 if the applicant submits an application, written request, or notice of intent to submit an application pursuant to SB 102 prior to the effective date of SB 328. For a comprehensive review and analysis of the Live Local Act changes brought about by SB 328, please visit Stearns Weaver Miller’s article available here. The Governor signed SB 328 on May 16, 2024. This bill is effective upon signature.

 

 

Statutory Provisions for Special Districts Amended

 

House Bill 7013 makes several changes to Florida Statutory provisions for special districts. It prohibits the creation of new safe neighborhood improvement districts after July 1, 2024 and repeals a statutory provision that allowed special districts to convert to municipalities without the approval of the state legislature. It creates term limits of 12 years for members of the governing body of an independent special district. The bill requires that all special districts other than community development districts can only have their borders changed by a general law or special act. It allows special districts to be declared inactive if they have not reported revenue, debt, or expenditures for five years, but allows inactive districts to continue to pay debt. The bill requires special districts to establish goals and objectives as well as metrics for measuring the achievement of those goals. It requires fire control districts to report the completion of required trainings to the state fire marshal. The bill lowers the maximum millage that can be assessed by a special district to one mill per dollar with a possible increase to two mills per dollar if approved by referendum at a general election. The Governor signed HB 7013 on April 26, 2024. This bill will take effect on July 1, 2024.

 

 

Department of Environmental Protection’s Rules Relating to Stormwater Ratified

 

Senate Bill 7040 ratifies and makes changes to the Department of Environmental Protection’s (“DEP”) rules relating to stormwater. The DEP developed rules to increase the removal of nutrients from stormwater to protect the state’s waterways. These proposed rules were estimated to increase stormwater treatment costs by $1.21 billion within five years triggering the statutory requirement that the rules be ratified by the Legislature before becoming effective. The bill extends the timeframe for a permit application to be deemed complete from 12 months to 18 months after the effective date of the revised rules. It provides that entities implementing stormwater management best practices also regulated under other provisions of law are not subject to duplicate inspections. It allows alternative treatment standards for redevelopment projects in areas with impaired waters and provides that a stormwater management system is presumed to not violate state water quality standards if an applicant demonstrates its designs and plans meet performance standards and other requirements under the revised rules. The bill also clarifies that nothing in the revised rules eliminates any grandfathered provisions in existence prior to the effective date of the ratified rules and exempts certain projects approved prior to January 1, 2024 from the revised rules. If signed by the Governor, this bill will become effective upon signature.

 

 

Chapter 718, F.S. Amended to Include Recordkeeping,

Disclosure of Records Requirements and Requirements of Officers and

Directors of Condominium Associations

 

House Bill 1021 makes numerous changes to Chapter 718, Florida Statutes, regarding rules for Condominium Associations. The bill makes changes to recordkeeping and disclosure of records requirements including requiring associations of 25 or more units to make records available digitally by 2026 and allowing associations to meet disclosure requirements by making records available online or through a mobile application. It makes changes to surety bonding, education requirements, and criminal penalties for malfeasance of officers and directors. It requires that structural integrity reserve studies be completed by developers and be provided to the association when the developer hands over control, and to individual owners within 45 days of receipt. It also requires that the Division of Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes keep record of these studies and which associations have completed them starting in its annual report at the end of 2024. The bill broadens protections for owners against retaliation by the association, makes changes to the Condominium ombudsman program, adds a statute of repose to the statute of limitations, and makes changes and additions to the law regarding mixed-use condominium buildings. If signed by the Governor, this bill will take effect on July 1, 2024.

LEGAL UPDATES

City of Delray Beach v. DeLeonibus, No. 4D2023-0123, 2024 WL 358014 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).


Fourth DCA Holds that City Not Equitably Estopped from Disavowing Building Permits that Violated City Regulations


In early 2019, Homeowners in Delray Beach submitted permit applications to build a three-story duplex on their property, including a rooftop terrace that would have exceeded the City’s maximum building height limitations. A City building official issued the permits in July 2019, despite the proposal’s violation of the City’s height regulations. In September 2019, the City disavowed the permits because City regulations required that any request for exception to the height restrictions had to go through the City’s Review Board. The Homeowners initially applied to the Review Board for a variance, but later withdrew their application stating they would “complete construction pursuant to the permit and previously approved plans.” Subsequently, the City passed a more restrictive ordinance in March 2021, lowering the height restrictions and curtailing the Review Board’s ability to grant exceptions. The Homeowners sued claiming the City was equitably estopped from disavowing the permits and enforcing the new Ordinance. The Fourth DCA held that there could be no equitable estoppel because the building official never had the authority to issue the permits in the first place and the City’s disavowal gave the Homeowners an opportunity to seek an exception through the Review Board, a process they failed to complete.

Parque Towers Devs., LLC v. Pilac Mgmt., Ltd., No. 3D21-1365, 2024 WL 173105 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024).


Third DCA holds that Condominium Developer Not Liable to Buyers for Delivery of Condos Later than Estimated Completion Date and with Less Square Footage than Initially Estimated


Five purchasers of pre-construction units in a Condominium development sued the developer for breach of contract and fraud in the inducement. They claimed that the developer had contracted to complete construction by December 31, 2017 (the condos were not delivered until early 2019) and that the developer had fraudulently misrepresented the total square footage of the condos in violation of Fla. Stat. § 718.506(1). The purchasers claimed that the developer had contracted the units to be 2,500 square feet when the actual square footage of the completed units was under 2,000. The Third DCA held that because the contract did not guarantee delivery by a date certain, but instead referenced December 31, 2017 as an estimated completion date, the developer could not be held in breach of a completion date that was purely estimated. With regards to the fraud claim, the Court found contractual language whereby the parties agreed that the listed square footage was only an estimate. The Court held that there was no fraud because “Parque Towers retained discretion to modify the floor plans of the units at will during construction, and the Purchasers expressly disclaimed their reliance on any representations as to square footage.” 

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Haaland, No. 23-CV-20495-PAS, 2024 WL 81309 (S.D. Fla. 2024).


District Court Vacates 2022 Development Agreement Between National Park Service and Miami-Dade County Holding it Violates the National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act


Miami-Dade County owns land near the Miami Zoo that it received from the Federal Government in the 1970’s & 80’s with restrictions that the land be used for public parks or other recreational purposes. In 2011, the County entered into an agreement with the National Park Service (“NPS”) transferring those deed restrictions to other property. They then began planning to develop the land near the Zoo into a water park, hotel, and retail area. In 2022, the County and NPS entered into an agreement and release terminating the land-use restrictions on these parcels. The Center for Biological Diversity and other interested parties sued claiming that the NPS violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) by not undertaking the requisite environmental review and consultation and had failed to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) regarding potential adverse impact to species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). The District Court held that NPS unlawfully failed to consult with FWS either informally or formally, and vacated the 2022 agreement.

Walt Disney Parks & Resorts U.S., Inc. v. DeSantis, No. 4:23-CV-163-AW-MJF, 2024 WL 442546 (N.D. Fla. 2024).


District Court Dismisses Lawsuit over Changes to Special District Finding that Legislative Purpose is Irrelevant when a Law is Facially Constitutional


Since its inception in 1967, by virtue of being the district’s largest landowner, Disney had exercised de facto control over the board of the Reedy Creek Improvement District, a special improvement district created under Florida law to provide services (Water, Sewer, Waste Management, Fire, etc.) to the Disney Parks and Resorts area. In 2022, Disney publicly spoke out against a recently passed Florida law known colloquially as the “Don’t Say Gay” law. Governor DeSantis and the Florida Legislature then passed a law changing the governing structure of the special district Disney resided in, stripping Disney’s control of the board and replacing the board members with gubernatorial appointees who are subject to Senate confirmation. Disney sued the Governor, the Secretary of Commerce and the newly appointed members of the board claiming their First Amendment free speech rights had been unlawfully interfered with. Judge Allen Winsor, a U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of Florida dismissed the case on the grounds that Disney did not have standing to sue the Governor or Secretary. While the Judge did find standing with regards to the newly-appointed board members, he held that because the challenged law was facially constitutional it could not be invalidated on the grounds of legislative or gubernatorial intent. 

Setai Resort & Residence Condominium Association, Inc. v. Shore Club Property Owner, LLC & City of Miami Beach, 2023 WL 1576523 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2024).


Circuit Court Affirms Special Injury Requirement to Confer Standing at the Special Magistrate Hearing


Setai Resort & Residences Condominium Association Inc. (“Association”), challenged the City of Miami Beach Historic Preservation Board’s (“HPB”) certificate of appropriateness approval for Shore Club Property Owner, LLC (“Shore Club”). Prior to the final approval, HPB required Shore Club to submit revised plans pursuant to staff and HPB comments. HPB approved the Shore Club’s application for a certificate of appropriateness. The Association requested a new hearing which was denied as well as the petition for writ of certiorari to quash HPB’s decision. On appeal, the Circuit Court denied the Association’s petition for certiorari. Although the Circuit Court rejected the Shore Club’s standing argument at the Special Magistrate hearing, holding that the Association met the special injury requirement as an abutting neighbor of the Shore Club and as such was an affected person under the City of Miami Beach Code, it found in favor of the Shore Club on the remaining issues. 

Anson v. City of Deltona, 6:23-CV-766-PGB-LHP, 2024 WL 895328 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2024).


Middle District Denies Motion to Dismiss Actions for Inverse Condemnation


Plaintiff brought an action against the City of Deltona alleging that the City removed a flood control structure after Hurricane Ian which redirected rising flood waters from Deltona through and over the Plaintiff’s community, essentially creating a drainage easement. In addition, because the flood control structures remained open, Plaintiff argued this constitutes a permanent invasion and brought action for inverse condemnation under the Florida and United States Constitutions. In response, the City argued that Plaintiff failed to state a proper claim for inverse condemnation because the complaint did not allege the government’s interference constitutes a substantial interference with their property rights. The Middle District rejected the City’s argument and denied the motion to dismiss. The Court reasoned that a physical invasion constitutes a per se taking. Moreover, relying on established case law, the Court found that even a temporary or intermittent invasion of private property can trigger the physical takings liability. 

MEET OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT, ZONING & ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM

Reggie Bouthillier

Anastasia Barnes*

Planner

Elise Batsel

Fatou Calixte

Jeffrey Collier

Jacob Cremer

Samantha Decker

Tina Ekblad, AICP*

Planner

Carl Eldred

Elizabeth Desloge Ellis

Vinette Godelia

Maria Gralia

Shawn Halphen*

GIS Services

Jessica Icerman

Felicia Kitzmiller

Nicole Neugebauer MacInnes

Kenneth Metcalf, AICP*

Planner

Evan Neustater

Kevin Reali

Amelia Savage

Simone Savino

Christopher Smith*

GIS Services

David Smith*

Planner

Cynthia Spidell, MBA, AICP*

Susan Stephens

Erin Tilton





We frequently collaborate with other Attorneys & Specialists statewide in a multidisciplinary approach to address all legal and business issues in a matter. 

Johnathan Ayers

Construction

Denay Brown

Real Estate

Glenn Burhans, Jr.

Litigation

Christopher Clark

Litigation

Abigail Corbett

Sea Level Rise

Peter Desiderio

Real Estate

Roger Houle*

Real Estate Analyst

Alice Huneycutt

Litigation

John Muratides

Litigation

Yuliya Olvy*

Real Estate Analyst

Marco Paredes, Jr.

Government Affairs

Sabrina Weiss

Robinson

Ad Valorem Tax

Darrin Quam

Litigation

Robert Walters

Litigation & Governmental Affairs


*Ken Metcalf, David Smith, Tina Ekblad, Cynthia Spidell, Chris Smith, Shawn Halphen, Roger Houle, Yuliya Olvy and Anastasia Barnes are not attorneys and are not authorized to practice law.

Ken, Tina, David, Cynthia and Anastasia are highly experienced planners. Ken, Tina and Cynthia are AICP certified.

Chris and Shawn are highly experienced GIS analysts.

Roger and Yuliya are highly experienced real estate analysts.


Special thanks to our law clerks who assisted in the drafting of this alert:

  • Emily Kennard: Rising third year Juris Doctor Candidate at Stetson University College of Law.
  • Joseph Myers: Rising third year Juris Doctor Candidate at Stetson University College of Law.
Facebook  Linkedin

The information provided in this email does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information in this email is for informational purposes only. Information in this email is general in nature and may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Readers of this email should contact us or an attorney of their choice to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader of this email should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information in this email without first seeking legal advice from counsel. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. This email does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and the authors of the email or this law firm.

About Stearns Weaver Miller

  

Stearns Weaver Miller is a Florida-based law firm with more than 150 attorneys and offices in Miami, Coral Gables, Fort Lauderdale, Tampa and Tallahassee. For over 40 years, our multidisciplinary team of attorneys and professionals have worked collaboratively to help our clients understand and resolve complex legal issues and disputes. For more information, please visit stearnsweaver.com.