Volume 21 | August 2022

HR & the Law in the News

Pssst...Check out two FREE events this month!

NLRB & DOJ Join Fight Against Antitrust & "Unfair Employer Practices"


From April to June at least three federal agencies announced initiatives targeting employers' anti-trust violations.


Continuing that trend, on July 19th, the Department of Justice and National Labor Relations Board signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to enhance their coordination and cooperation, "to protect workers from collusion and unfair employer behavior."

Click here for more information and resources.

US CIS & DHS Propose Possible Form I-9 Changes


On August 18th, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a proposed rule in the federal register. The rule may impact how employers process the Form I-9 to confirm a newly hired employee’s identity and authorization to work in the U.S.

Click here to read the rest of this story.

Private Entity Seeks Public Disclosure of Private Contractors' EEO-1 Data


The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR), a non-profit, investigative news organization, is seeking the public release of private federal government contractors' Type 2, EEO-1 data (demographic, not compensation) by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP).


This battle has been brewing four more than four years. If you are a prime or first-tier federal contractor, you have until September 19th to respond to the OFCCP's request for comment. 

Click here to read more and for a links to submit your comments.  

Employers Get Active to Protect Captive Audience Speech

Imagine you hear a workplace rumor that some of your employees are considering forming or joining a union. You have an open-door policy, pay market-competitive wages, and think they do not need to pay to a third party any part of their well-earned money to be their advocate. 


You would like to have a meeting so you can hear your employees’ concerns and share your opinion. Would that meeting “inherently involve an unlawful threat that employees will be disciplined or suffer other reprisals if they exercise their protected right not to listen to such speech?” 

Click here for the answer and what may lie on the horizon.
Supreme Court building in Washington_ DC_ United States of America

How Reasonable is a Reasonable Accommodation for Religious Observance?

In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled that an employer must provide a reasonable accommodation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for an employee’s religious observance. An accommodation became unreasonable and one the employer would not have to provide if it imposed more than a de minimis cost on the employer.


In 1986, the Court clarified that Title VII does “not impose a duty on the employer to accommodate at all costs.” A reasonable accommodation “eliminates the conflict between employment requirements and religious practices.”


Last month, the Court was petitioned to revisit this issue and answer two questions.

Click here to continue.

E-SIGN Act Correction and Follow Up!


Last month, an article read that the E-SIGN Act was signed into law on June 30, 2020. That should have read, 2000! Thanks to the reader who brought that typo to my attention; I appreciate you! 


P.S. The answer to the quiz question was President Clinton signed the act by hand as well as electronically.

Click here if you missed the article. 
Click here for all news stories!

UPCOMING EVENTS



ICYMI - August's Archived Webcasts



Recorded events still provide the listed and pre-approved HRCI & SHRM credits.


Click here for the full listing of all upcoming and archived events.
Click here to order your copy today!
In its 2nd Edition!
A SHRMStore "Great 8" Best-Seller
8 Years in a Row!
Thank YOU!
This publication does not constitute the rendering of legal advice. You should consult your company's legal counsel for guidance on any matter. 
FiveL Company | info@FiveL.net | www.FiveL.net
STAY CONNECTED
Twitter  Linkedin  
Visit the website