VIEW THIS EMAIL AS A WEBPAGE >>

21 March 2024 — A Vital Transportation Route, but a Grueling Journey Upriver


In “‘Mr. Fulton’s Ingenious Steam Boat’ Takes Her Place in History,” we looked at Clermont/North River Steamboat, the vessel that, by successfully carrying passengers on the circuit between New York City and Albany, fulfilled the contractual requirements allowing the partners Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston to operate under a state-granted monopoly on steam-powered passenger business along the Hudson. This monopoly was an alternative method to encourage innovation and foster desirable amenities for the states; the patent process of the young US federal government, still struggling to establish processes that had a history of precedent in other, older countries, was often expensive for applicants and sometimes issued patents that were practically unenforceable. Innovators in the field of steamboats turned to state-issued monopolies as a means of assuring a profit after the considerable costs of building a vessel using the new technology, offering the state or territory in return the benefit of faster, cheaper transportation of goods and people. 

map of Mississippi and tributaries

The Mississippi and its tributaries were a vital transportation route, and the port of New Orleans was the link between the western territories and the eastern United States. Map: Wikimedia Commons

Meanwhile, the West was calling innovators in transportation. In 1803 Robert Livingston and James Monroe negotiated the Louisiana Purchase, predominantly to gain American control over the port of New Orleans; the move also had essentially doubled the size of the United States. Prior to the railways and a passable road network, the Mississippi River system was the best way to move goods and people, and New Orleans was the crucial gateway to traffic into and out of the region. In his 1880 history of Mississippi, one-term Congressman, newspaperman and historian John Francis Hamtramck Claiborne summed up the options for transporting cargo along this vital artery:


The keel-boat was long and slender, sharp fore and aft, with a narrow gangway just within the gunwale, for the boatmen as they poled or warped up the stream, when not aided by the eddies that made their oars available. When the keel-boat was covered with a low house, lengthwise, between the gangways, it was dignified with the name of “barge.” The only claim of the flat-boat, or “broad-horn;” to rank as a vessel was due to the fact that it floated upon water and was used as a, vehicle for transportation. Keel-boats, barges, and flat-boats had prodigious steering oars, and oars of the same dimensions were hung on fixed pivots on the sides of the last named, by which the shapeless and cumbrous contrivance was, in some sort, managed. Ignorant of anything better, the people of the west were satisfied with these appliances of trade in 1810.

ink drawing of keelboat passing a flatboat

A flatboat (foreground) and keelboat around Pittsburgh, late 18th century. Image: PD.

Once they reached their destination, the crude flatboats were broken up and sold for lumber, as they created too much resistance to the current and might not survive the journey. Anyone who wanted to be able to make the return trip against the current chose the keelboat or barge, with a shape that provided less water resistance. Even so, while the trip from Pittsburgh down to the port of New Orleans in such a vessel might take around six weeks, coming back could take four and a half months, powered by the efforts of the crewmen. These keelboats were driven forward by poling—each man pressing a long iron-tipped pole against the river bottom to propel the boat; by cordelling—swimming to shore with the cordelle, a towline attached to the boat, and pulling on the cordelle while walking the shoreline; or warping—advancing ahead of the boat by skiff, tying the cordelle to a sturdy tree, and pulling forward via a capstan on the boat. Replacing manpower with steam would be a game-changer. A letter in the Cincinnati Gazette in 1815 asserted: “The invention of the steamboat was intended for us. The puny rivers of the East are only as creeks, or convenient waters on which experiments may be made for our advantage.”


And indeed, Fulton and his competitors had their eye on the Western Rivers as they continued to tinker with steam engines and paddles and negotiated the complex legal paths to protect their creations. Who would be the next great name in steam navigation? We'll rejoin this story in our next installment.



Extra Credit


“Flatboats of the Ohio River Valley”


Sea History Today is written by Shelley Reid, NMHS senior staff writer. Past issues can be read online by clicking here.

Facebook  Twitter  Instagram  YouTube