November 8, 2010
Gina Clowes: Good Morning
Dr. Burks. Thank you so much for talking with me today. I know our
readers will be very interested to hear the latest on your
research. For those who are not familiar, would you briefly
explain oral immunotherapy?
Dr. Wesley Burks:
Oral immunotherapy is a treatment where allergic children are fed
minute amounts of the food protein and carefully increase the
amounts over time in order to desensitize the child to that food
protein.
Gina: And you started with egg
immunotherapy first?
Dr. Burks: Yes, we
did.
Gina: Then you moved onto to
peanut. Of course our families are aware that peanut and tree nut
account for most fatal and near fatal reactions. What were you
thinking before the study began? What was that like for
you?
Dr. Burks: What we
hoped to do is address the unmet need that is there for development
of a new treatment, or some type of specific treatment that would
help the allergic disease go away.
Gina: Right. As a researcher,
what happened during that study, or any of during any of the oral
immunotherapy research that you've done that surprised
you?
Dr. Burks: I think
several things were interesting as we went through this study. One
was the benefit that patients and their families receive from -
they're realizing that their threshold changed if they were on the
study treatment.
Before the study, they were having a
reaction to certain amount that went up significantly while they
were on the study.
I think the second thing that was
interesting is that immunologically we saw significant changes
while the patient was on the treatment.
I think another thing is that it was
interesting to see the side effects of the therapy that clearly
there were about 15-20 percent of the people that will not tolerate
the treatment. And the types of the unanticipated safety events
that we had that weren't really things that people had talked about
with other types of immune therapy.
Gina: Do you want to say more
about the unanticipated safety effects?
Dr. Burks: From a safety
standpoint about 15-20 percent of patients when they enter the
study, after the first few months, will not tolerate the treatment,
most of the time for recurrent gastrointestinal
effects.
The others that stay in, then there are
allergic side effects related to viral infections and exercise. And
I think we just barely understand the relationship between those
factors and then the outcome of the allergic side
effects.
Gina: When they get a viral
illness during the immunotherapy, they don't go back baseline, do
they? They just need to back up a little bit in the treatment
before moving forward, again, is that correct?
Dr. Burks: We'll
decrease the dose, and then work our way back up.
Gina: That's interesting. I
understand that your colleague,
Dr. Bird in Texas, is now studying
the immune system and how tree nut allergic children respond to
viruses. So, hopefully, we'll hear more - or learn more about
that.
Dr. Burks:
Yes.
Gina: I think back to one of my
son's worst reactions when we were actually in the ambulance with
an anaphylactic reaction. He was sick with a viral illness at the
time. Do you think there should be a general warning to parents to
perhaps be a little more vigilant about reactions when your child
is sick?
Dr. Burks: Well, I don't
know that viral infections - how much they play a part in natural
reactions. What we are talking about is just the interaction of
viral infections and fever, and then immunotherapy.
Gina: Okay. Got
it.
Let's talk a little about how the
immunotherapy is done. Right now, whether it's milk, egg or peanut,
the food is in the form of a powder. Why is it given in this form,
and how is it prepared?
Dr. Burks: The powder
that we are using with peanut is from a candy manufacturer. So
it's powder - it's like a flour that is primarily protein, with the
other parts of the peanut taken out; the oil and the
fat.
And we mix that powder with other foods,
so that they can ingest it. It's not mixed in liquid. We've found
that if it's mixed in liquid, then you have significantly more side
effects.
Gina: Really?
Dr. Burks: It's put in
the food, and then the food is swallowed. And that allows it to
bypass, to some degree, the esophagus and get into the stomach, and
then in circulation.
Gina: All right, so it's from a
candy manufacturer! Interesting. I'm sure you must be meticulous
in how you measure this. How much peanut are they given at the
very beginning?
Dr. Burks: Literally, we
start out at about 1/1000th of a peanut. And that amount is
increased over time. The top doses that we get to range anywhere
from 1-15 peanuts, depending on the study.
Gina: Allergy parents are
constantly watching those food specific IgE levels, hoping to spot
a trend of outgrowing. But you're actually seeing the IgE levels
go up, at least in the beginning, is that
correct?
Dr. Burks: Yes, the IgE
levels go up and then back down during the course of the
study.
Gina: And the IgG4 levels go up.
That's the one thing that goes up and stays up, and that's a good
thing. Could you explain a little bit about
that?
Dr. Burks: The IgG4 goes
up while you're on the study. It stays up throughout the life of
the study.
Traditionally, IgG4 was thought to be the
antibody that would block the allergic reaction, so it was called a
blocking antibody. Really, we don't understand how it works, and
whether that's the reason that individuals get better, or it's just
a byproduct of the immune system.
But in any type of traditional
immunotherapy, IgG4s going up, while you're on treatment to that
allergen, is a good thing, and it's been associated with an
improved outcome. But whether there's a reason for the improved
outcome, or just a byproduct of it, we really don't
know.
Gina: Let's talk about the goals
with this treatment. My understanding is that when a patient is
treated with allergy shots for a venom allergy, they go through
this for three, four, or five years. And then a lot of them are
done for life. They're desensitized - for life,
right?
Dr. Burks:
Yes.
Gina: Is that a hope with
immunotherapy with food? Is that possible? What are the odds that
would happen with some of these children?
Dr. Burks: Well, the
goals of the therapy are two-fold. One is to cause some type of
desensitization. Meaning that if you're not on the treatment that
your threshold is "x", and if you're on the treatment, your
threshold is "x" plus "y". So it goes up significantly. But
you're still in the treatment.
Another goal of any type of immunotherapy
would be to treat someone for a period of three, four, or five
years. And at that point, hopefully, you can stop the therapy, and
they are tolerant. So they're tolerant of whatever that food or
allergen, or insect venom.
So that's the ultimate goal is can you
treat someone for a period of time, stop the treatment, and they're
clinically tolerant. They can eat it without worrying about
it.
Gina: What is the longest you've
followed a patient who's gone this oral immunotherapy for any
food?
Dr. Burks: For 5+
years...
Gina: Do these patients still have
to keep the food in their diet, daily?
Dr. Burks: We have some
patients that have been treated for a period of time, that are off
the therapy, and they're eating peanuts in their diet. We have
some other patients that have been on the therapy for an equal
amount of time and haven't been able to stop the
therapy.
Gina: Of the children who are
considered tolerant, have any of those children had an adverse
reaction out of the blue?
Dr. Burks: No, they have
not.
Gina: Are there any
generalizations that you can make that about kids that tolerate the
immunotherapy verses those who don't?
Dr. Burks: No, we really
can't.
Gina: Can you say how often
children who are undergoing immunotherapy end up with EE
(EoE)?
Dr. Burks: No, as I said
earlier, about 15-20 percent of kids cannot tolerate the therapy.
And, predominately, those side effects are in the gastrointestinal
tract.
Gina: Let's talk about what's on
the horizon. Will you be doing oral immunotherapy for tree nuts,
and if so, do you foresee any kind of a tree nut mix for those
children who have multiple tree nut allergies?
Dr. Burks: The studies
are broadening in nature. There are investigators studying milk
and egg, tree nuts, shellfish, fish.
There's not any reason to think that if
it works for a peanut, that it wouldn't work for any other foods.
The side effects might be different, and that's what we need - and
others, need to find out about before we feel like it might be a
possibility.
I think one of the other concepts that you
talked about is the use of one tree nut if you're multiple tree nut
allergic. And, again, that is being studied, and we don't know the
answer to it, yet.
Gina: You're saying that perhaps
if you desensitize someone to one tree nut, it might affect some of
the other tree nut allergies?
Dr. Burks: Yeah, we don't
know that, but that's an idea that is being studied.
Gina: That would be
lovely!
Dr. Burks: Yes, it is
under investigation but we don't know the answer.
Gina: Looking at other research,
we see children who are desensitized using baked egg or baked milk,
and they go on to consume different forms of cooked milk or egg.
Eventually, most of them go on to all forms of cooked egg and even
unheated milk.
Since we know that boiled peanuts
are less allergenic than dry roasted peanuts, has anyone ever
looked at trying to desensitize kids using boiled peanuts? Have we
looked at this?
Dr Burks: Various
investigators have suggested this idea and some are beginning to
study it.
Gina: Let's talk about the future
of immunotherapy and when it might be widely
available.
You're aware that other allergists
are offering oral immunotherapy in their offices. You published an
article earlier this year basically saying that we're not ready to
offer oral immunotherapy just yet. Would you explain
why?
Dr. Burks: For oral
immunotherapy currently, we only know that it causes
desensitization. We don't know that it causes long-term
tolerance. And we know that individuals that are on the therapy
their threshold likely goes up, but they are still unknown and
unanticipated allergic side effects that can be quite significant
and can be systemic in nature. And we don't that the individuals
treated will truly become tolerate tolerant long-term.
The side effects are not all known yet,
so it is important to know these before beginning to treat
everyone. There are a number of clinical trials ongoing now and
when those are completed we will have a better idea of the dose
that might cause desensitization and also when it might
occur.
Gina: I hear what you're saying.
I take it very seriously, I do. I appreciate you sharing your
thoughts on this issue. So just to clarify, even with all of your
experience with this, you do not offer immunotherapy for food to
your patients?
Dr. Burks: Yes, that is
correct.
Gina: Parents are so anxious for
treatment. Realistically - what is the timeframe for this? What do
you foresee as the best-case and worst case
scenario?
Dr. Burks: If you look at
all the different treatment options investigators are studying
internationally for peanut allergies, there are several in larger
studies. Chinese herbal medicine, oral immunotherapy. sublingual
immunotherapy, reengineered proteins and epicutaneous immunotherapy
are all in clinical trials.
So, of all those things, then probably
the first thing that could be available would be the Chinese herbal
medicine because it's being studied as a supplement and it goes
through a different regulatory process.
So if it's effective, and it's being
studied now, it might be available in two to four
years.
And then you look the next group of
studies, those need five-year studies done to look at tolerance.
And they are just now beginning to being designed.
Gina: On a more personal level,
why do you do what you do? You're putting yourself out there when
you're doing this research. I have to believe there's a little bit
of trepidation.
Dr. Burks: The reason
that we, and a lot of others, started this a long time ago is that
we knew there were a lot of kids that had food allergy, a rising
number that had peanut allergy, and we really didn't have a good
treatment option for them.
Gina: One last question. We
obviously want to see more research from you, but at the end of
your career, what would have happened that you would retire and
say, "I did what I set out to do"?
Dr. Burks: That's an
interesting question. I think mine is not related to a specific
project, but just more with the people that I work with and the
people that are training. I'd want to know that they can learn
from what all of us are doing, and that they will continue, and
make it better.
To
comment on this topic, click
here.
A. Wesley Burks,
MD is the Kiser-Arena Professor and Chief of the Division of
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology at Duke University Medical Center
in Durham, North Carolina.
For general information on Clinical Trials
at Duke, click here.
For information about the Duke Food
Allergy Initiative, click here.
For more information about Dr.
Wesley Burks, or to schedule an appointment at the Duke Children's
Center, click here.
|