|
Deal of the Week
by Bruce Schwaidelson
Keep Those Cards and Letters Coming In!
Believe it or not, you are reading my 25th Deal of the Week column! Your DOTW writers (Mitch, Rex, John, Bucky, and myself) have been sharing our thoughts since the Summer of COVID 2020. I can’t speak for the others, but I have had loads of fun creating these things, and it’s gratifying that from time-to-time at least half a dozen “fans” have been kind enough to comment on my columns (mostly positive) either at the club or via email. Some have even mentioned that they’ve gotten a few chuckles or have noted they actually learned something new bridge-wise.
Although your emails don’t exactly pour in, I do get some bridge questions, too, including this recent request:
-----Dear Smart-Guy: all red in 2nd seat my hand was:
----------J108xx AKJ108 A10 x
-----The bidding was:
----------1d - 2d* – p - 2h----*majors
----------3c - 3h - 4d - p
----------p-. - x-. - all p
-----I doubled 4d thinking it meant DSI.
-----Partner had xx xxxx xxx KQ9x. She passed and they made
-----4dx (-710); she insists that my X is penalty. What say you, O
-----Wise One?
------------------------------------- Your (One & Only?) Loyal Fan
Before getting to my reply, let’s talk about one of bridge’s greatest inventions: the so-called “DSI” double asking partner to “Do Something Intelligent.” Really!? Does that mean when your double is take-out, negative, responsive, support, penalty, SOS, lead-directing, etc., in those cases you want pard to be the happy-go-lucky, devil-may-care, unthinking person he or she usually is? Should we call the latter group the “NINNY” doubles (Nope-Intelligence Not Needed Yet)?
Why is a DSI double so great? Because it beautifully passes the buck to partner when things don’t work out well. “I had no idea what to do, pard, so I asked you to utilize your superior intelligence. I guess that was short-sided on my part.”
Many moons ago, we called those doubles “cooperative” but that indicated a shared responsibility. Now we get to put it all on partner. And so I responded:
|