The Nevada Farm Bureau Board of Directors, following presentations by both the supporters of passage of Ballot Question 3 and those who are opposed to passage, made the decision to support a vote against passage of this proposed change to Nevada’s Constitution.
Ballot Question 3, if adopted would amend the Nevada Constitution to establish a system of “Ranked-choice voting.” Ranked-choice voting (RCV) is an alternative voting method where voters rank candidates in order of preference instead of choosing just one. If a candidate receives more than 50 percent of first-preference votes, they win. If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed to the voters' next preferences. This process continues until a candidate secures a majority of the votes.
As the team working to persuade Nevada voters to vote “NO” on Ballot Question 3 have shared, this proposal would be bad for Nevada:
1. Complex and Confusing: RCV can be confusing for voters. The process of ranking candidates and understanding how votes are redistributed can lead to mistakes and spoiled ballots, disenfranchising voters.
2. Longer and Costlier Elections: Counting RCV ballots is more complicated and time-consuming, leading to longer waits for election results. This complexity also increases the cost of administering elections.
3. Reduced Voter Turnout:*Studies have shown that voter turnout can decrease under RCV due to its complexity. When people don't understand the system, they are less likely to participate.
4. Potential for Unfair Outcomes: In some cases, RCV can result in the election of a candidate who did not receive the most first-preference votes, which can feel unfair to voters.
Please visit this website to learn more details and consider adding your name with those who are voting “NO” on Nevada Ballot Question 3.
|