Why does party affiliation matter? Shouldn't we be voting for the best candidate?
As mentioned previously, our country has had political parties since its inception. Political parties are defined by their ideology that may or may not change over time. Citizens align with parties that match their own ideology. This creates a sense of fraternity and helps support common interests, taking a group approach.
Citizens should vote for the best candidate in their opinion, however, they may not personally know or have time to understand how a candidate's beliefs aligns with their own. Thus nonpartisan elections are generally local level elections with small numbers of people. Partisan elections are larger elections evolving large groups of people. Partisan elections ensure citizens' votes align with their ideology even if they haven't fully vetted the candidate. Partisanship also helps hold candidates who are elected to the ideology they campaigned on.
Here are some differences between partisan and non-partisan elections as defined by The National League of Cities:
Proponents of nonpartisan ballots suggest that:
- Political parties are irrelevant to providing services.
- Cooperation between elected officials belonging to different parties is more likely.
Proponents for partisan elections argue that:
- The absence of party labels confuses voters; a voter who must choose from among a group of candidates whom she knows nothing about will have no meaningful basis in casting a ballot.
- In the absence of a party ballot, voters will turn to whatever cue is available, which often turns out to be the ethnicity of a candidate’s name.
- Non-partisanship tends to produce elected officials more representative of the upper socioeconomic strata than of the general populace and aggravates the class bias in voting turnout, because in true non-partisan systems there are no organizations of local party workers to bring lower-class citizens to the polls on election day.
|