Many people looking to work in New Zealand want to stay, to have a pathway to Residence. Employers want to keep valuable staff long-term, because of the cost of losing their expertise and of having to hire and train someone else. Offering Residence as a carrot is a definite advantage in the war for talent.
For some jobs in IT, engineering and health, or for jobs paid over $115K, the path is clear-cut through the
Skilled Residence route. For the rest there is only the recently reopened Skilled Migrant Category (yes, we know, the names are confusing, but they are different things). Ensuring that someone can qualify for SMC Residence needs to start at the AEWV stage, and it can be tricky to navigate.
One reason is the different ways ANZSCO is used in the AEWV and SMC policies. For a job offer to be acceptable for a Work Visa, the employer's advertising must set out the minimum qualifications or experience required to do the job. To decide what is acceptable, INZ "may refer" to what ANZSCO sets as the minimum (e.g., 3 years' experience); or else assess whether the requirements set out in the advertising are "reasonably necessary" to do the job. This contemplates roles which do not easily fit into one ANZSCO classification.
In many small businesses, people do multiple jobs in their role. It is tempting to create a hybrid position to fit the actual situation. This is an advantage for companies who need to fill a position to solve multiple needs.
When it comes to SMC Residence the focus is much tighter. To score points for employment (which pretty much everyone must do), the job and the skills the migrant brings to it must be a "substantial match" to a single ANZSCO occupation. Someone on a Work Visa for a broad position who later applies for Residence and tries to claim a particular ANZSCO match to that job is likely to hit resistance, not only in claiming points for the job, but also points for the work experience they had already gained while working in New Zealand.
From our experience, such battles are painful, exhausting and time-consuming - and not just for the applicant. Residence could be declined in the end, or the worker might just give up and look for a job in Australia instead.
It therefore makes sense, even before Accreditation stage, to think about what jobs will actually be offered. Will they fit one ANZSCO description? If not, do you need to peg your own expectations and those of candidates back to seeing the Work Visa as a way to be in the country for just 2 or 3 years?
It is hard to give many more general rules about how to answer those sorts of questions. This is where we may be able to take an objective look at your plans to get accredited, and manage your expectations about what can be achieved by bolstering your workforce with overseas people.