From Study to Position: How Does it Happen and Why Do We Care?
You may know that the LWV of Illinois State League is engaged in a formal study of gun violence prevention. While the study is being led by the League’s state policy specialist on gun violence issues, all local Leagues are encouraged and expected to participate. The state committee is selecting and preparing questions and providing information to local chapters. Local leagues then will then form committees to examine the issues and seek additional background information relevant to their own region. It is important to represent a variety of viewpoints and a multifaceted picture of the issues involved.
Before any League—local, state, or the national—can take action, members must largely agree on what they think about that issue. Consensus is the process of discussion based on education and study related to the topic. The discussion should be broad based and involve an exchange of ideas and thoughts about the topic. This happens at Consensus meetings specific to the topic under study. The material being considered must be presented in a balanced and unbiased way. The discussion leader is neutral. Committee members must present all sides without bias, clarify points, and answer questions.
Once the questions have been examined from a variety of viewpoints, local League
committees hold meetings with their membership to arrive at Consensus. The state
committee compiles responses from participating local Leagues and submits the conclusions to the Illinois State League for adoption. This happens at the annual state convention. Once a position is adopted, and in coordination with the state Issue and Advocacy Committee, local leagues can advocate with their legislators, make public statements, participate in media interviews, and post about their positions online.
While League members can support positions as individuals, when representing the League or speaking using the League’s name, they must present the official League position on the topic that’s been reached by Consensus.
Another option for adopting an official League position is Concurrence. If a League sees that another chapter has studied an issue and adopted a position that’s relevant and compelling, the other League can adopt the same position, piggybacking on the work of the sister chapter and adding support. In this case, the position is presented to the relevant board for approval and membership votes to adopt the position through Concurrence at a state or national convention. This allows the work of the originating League chapter to be used on a broader scale. It streamlines the process of reaching a position. For example, board member Barbara Paterick recently alerted fellow board members to a request from the Washington State League to support its request for Concurrence on its study, The Decline of Local News and Its Impact on Democracy. With the U.S. League’s National Convention coming up, delegates from state Leagues will have opportunities to consider this and other studies. By alerting local and state Leagues in advance, voting delegates will have the opportunity to read the study, ask questions and make an informed choice.
It’s the League way—labor intensive but fair and fact based.
Tina Birnbaum
Vice-President
|