The U.S. Forest Service has been quietly working on a large Sand Lake Restoration Project for more than five years now, led by its Hebo Ranger District. The project includes quite a few different items, several of which are beneficial for the landscape, including increasing development of late-successional forest, restoring parabolic dunes, and improving the quality and diversity of various wildlife habitats.
But the project also includes a proposal that has so far received little attention: a new mountain bike trail system. Currently there is no such trail network in the Sand Lake area. This proposal – the Forest Service’s preferred alternative – will lead to building about thirty (30) miles of trails, eight miles of which would come from decommissioned roads. There would be two and a half acres of new parking built.
The question is: how large an effect will such a proposal have on the local environment and the communities in the Sand Lake area? The Forest Service, in its March 2024 environmental assessment, glosses over such questions with statements like, “The increase in trails and associated recreation infrastructure would bring an increase in users to the planning area.” The Forest Service analyzed three other trail systems for comparison, especially the Whiskey Run trail system in Bandon. Whiskey Run recorded 12,570 trail check-ins in 2020, with peak use occurring in summer, especially August. The Forest Service expects some 16,000 visitors per year to the new Sand Lake system, with some 5,330 vehicles per year – three trail users per vehicle.
The Forest Service assures reader that “In general the mountain biking community, which is the main user group expected to visit the proposed trail, is mindful of surrounding communities and values conservation.” The local user group, Tillamook Off Road Trail Alliance (TORTA), is in favor of the project, working closely with the Forest Service and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department.
Is the project as benign as the agencies and user groups portray it? Will it have just local users and be an integrated, non-harmful part of the community, engaging families and bringing in important tourist revenue? So far the Forest Service does not seem to have taken a hard look at the trends in other places that, in all fairness to the community, need to be openly discussed. Whiskey Run has outgrown itself in just a few years, and county plans are under discussion for additional parking, a new 30-place campground and additional trails. Other mountain bike trail systems in Oregon near large population centers, as Sand Lake is, see much higher user numbers than a quiet 16,000 as proposed by the Forest Service.
Currently the Environmental Assessment is back in Forest Service hands for another look at the amount of projected use of the mountain biking trail system, with a decision to be issued within a couple of months. It seems the trail promoters all present the plan as having minimum impacts and maximum local benefit. But a few concerned locals have looked at the explosive growth of other recent trail systems, the interest and influence of national mountain biking associations, and researched the hidden costs of a large influx of new visitors, such as the strain on local communities, and the county, whose infrastructure is often insufficient to handle so many tourists in a concentrated time period. This includes inadequate roads, emergency services, hotels, or water supply. ORCA suggests a transparent agency investigation, and a larger community conversation, about this project and its local costs, before issuing a final decision.
|