|
Important Changes to Water/Wastewater and CAMA Permitting Heard in Senate Judiciary
HB 385 (Various Energy/Env. Changes) was heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. Senate Committee Chairs chose to hear the bill for discussion only. As previously reported, the bill contains an important provision for coastal builders dealing with rebuilding within the same footprint a previously permitted dock or pier without repeating the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permitting process. It also includes a section that limits the ability of a local government unit to require an applicant for water and sewer service for residential development to agree to any condition that is “not authorized by law”. Furthermore, the bill prohibits any local government unit from accepting “any offer by the applicant to consent” to any condition not otherwise authorized by law.
Concerning the water and wastewater provision within H385, please note that on Wednesday the Senate modified this provision to clarify that a scoring system or preference system cannot include items not allowed under the law.
In addition to the CAMA dock and water and wastewater provision in H385, the legislation also included various statutory reforms (Section 11) to realign the Division of Coastal Management’s (DCM) current regulatory practices back to what we understand was the Legislature’s original intent when establishing CAMA. Please note that on Wednesday the Senate removed the previously proposed statutory realignment of DCM’s authority under CAMA and instead focused on an attempt to provide increased transparency and regulatory certainty involving the Office of State Archaeology’s disclosure of any known or suspected archaeological or historical significance of a property to current property owners and prospective purchasers.
Considering where the bill is in the legislative process and how the short session is developing, both the previous version of Section 11 and the current version will need further discussion before becoming law and this discussion will continue over the interim and into the next legislative long session in 2025. It is understood that the original language of Section 11 of HB 385 needs to be broader and more comprehensive than initially introduced earlier this month as it has been realized that the relationship between the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) and the Office of State Archaeology needs further examination relative to their impact to development within our state’s coastal counties.
We are sincerely grateful for the attention, time, and effort that lawmakers serving in the General Assembly, specifically for the leadership of Sen. Lazzara and Sen. Sanderson have demonstrated in an attempt to balance reasonable regulatory protections with property rights and how this balance directly affects the final purchase price of a home.
We look forward to the opportunity for more comprehensive discussions within this greatly needed area of regulatory reform in the upcoming long session.
The Senate is expected to move this bill to the floor next week, before sending it to the House.
|