If you had more money ... you could do more good.
If you do better communications ... you WILL have more money.
And, yes, for the most part, the emperor is wearing no clothes.
E minently re-quotable 
So I told 'em, "DONATE is a command, not an emotionally engaging offer. Let's try something that connects to their hearts instead...." And hence a new approach to buttons was born [cue baby wail]
 
I asked a simple question... 
How long does the average donor stay with a charity?

Prepare for a shock, below.
World-sourced answers from a gilded pantheon of remarkably well-informed experts.   
------ 
A few years ago, I asked my extended family of mentors a simple (well, simplistic) question: "What's the average age of the typical donor?"

I was shocked by how wrong my assumptions were.

Turns out that in the US, a YOUNG donor is 60, says direct mail maven Jeff Brooks; his data shows that almost half of US donors are 65 and older. Donors to a major hospital system I know well average 75 years of age. And according to Pareto, 83 is a prime giving age in Australia. Heck, my mother-in-law, Jane, was "direct mail responsive" into her 80s.

So now, when I write direct mail, I write to Jane. That's her in the photo: well-read, well-traveled, well-groomed, dining out at the Faculty Club.

BTW: the next big cohort of givers in the US will be baby boomers ... until about 2035. The oldest are almost 70 already. Time to get with that, charities.

Does magical thinking explain your boss's demand for younger donors?

Yet dark overlords will ever insist:

"We must find younger donors!"


As if that made incredibly evident sense.

As if maybe, once gained, a donor would generally last a lifetime ... so the earlier you acquire one, the better.
 
But how long IS the "giving span" of your average donor?

I asked my global family of beloved colleagues another simple/simplistic question:
 
"How long, do you think, the average donor gives to the same charity? 5 years? 10 years? 25 years? Off the top of your head."

And here's how my choir of expert-angels answered:
 
Dr. Adrian Sargeant had a precise number:
 
" 4.6 years in the UK. Based on an analysis of 5 million records. It's an amalgam of all forms of giving, so it lumps together very different types of giving. But as a number, it's nice. And it's getting lower each year."
 
Professor Stephen Pidgeon, international consultant, co-founder of mega UK agency, Tangible:
 
"With [one major UK charity] we used the figure of
6 years for a cash donor," he said.
 
Jeff Brooks, senior creative director at Truesense, a leading US direct mail house:
 
"We truncate lifetime value at 7 years because that captures almost all of the giving. Most donors give only once. It's rare even for a long-term donor to stay longer than 7 years."
 
Rory Green, Associate Director of Advancement, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Simon Fraser University:
 
"Many of my donors have given consecutively
for 10+ years ... BUT we're a bit of an anomaly. I would imagine the answer would differ, too, across generations: [older people] longer and less so as donors get younger."
 
Beth Ann Locke, a veteran fundraiser in both Canada and the US, now also at Simon Fraser:
 
"I think older donors are more loyal. [At one hospital, there were] donors who had had hips and knees replaced who just gave and gave, as long as you kept asking, for 20+ years. I'd say with some universities it is the same, once the habit takes hold." In contrast, Beth Ann saw a different pattern at an art museum: "You would bring them into the fold as donors after being members. Then they would fall off in a few years." Her overall conclusion? "I would guess 3-4 years is about average."

What her answer suggests to me is that a deep personal connection to a charity will strongly influence how long a person remains a supporter. Graduating from college or enjoying a happy outcome in a big health crisis: these are deeply felt, core life events. Looking at art exhibitions? Not so much.
 
John Lepp, co-founder of Toronto's remarkable Agents of Good, said:
 
"This is a tough one. Our beloved Jane Donor, I see her give to one charity for the first and last time. And others she supports on and off for 10 years maybe?"
 
Lisa Sargent, the Grand Guru of Thanks, passed along this piece of wisdom from a heavyweight agency guy she knows:
 
"The old rule of thumb I was taught is that half of all donors acquired through conventional acquisition (provided an organization has a proper acknowledgement program and then mails appeals on an average of every six weeks) will remain active for an average of two to three years. During this period these donors will make three to four additional contributions. Their average gifts will be 1.5 to two times the size of their inception donation. The other half will never make a second contribution."
 
Roger Craver, co-editor of The Agitator, and one of the Founding Fathers of modern direct mail fundraising, stated:
 
"'Top of my head' would be about 4 to 5 years. The single donors who only ever give one gift weigh down longevity. If you're looking only at donors who make two or more gifts, I would say the span is closer to 7 or 8 years."

"There is no 'average donor,'" protested Sean Triner, co-founder of Pareto, Australia's top fundraising agency. "Street acquired monthly giver? SMS donor? Emergency responder? Event participant? Direct mail? Major donors? Digital acquired monthly giver? Direct mail donor who starts a monthly gift? To average across all of them makes no sense."

Still, he humored me. "The average will be around 2-3 years," assuming you include in your calculation one-time donors. Those one-timers "account for more than half" and drag down the average.
 
Mark Phillips, founder and manager of Bluefrog in London, "I'm probably closer to Sean. I find that the best 5% of the file tend to stick with you forever. The problem is the other 70% of people who only ever intended to give once. They really drag your average down."
 
Summary
 
Don't overestimate the "stickiness" of donors. Over half give just once. Very few donors stay longer than a few years: precisely 4.6 years in the UK, according to Adrian's research. Which means a program for regularly acquiring new donors remains vital to your financial health.
 
Pay special attention to the "4%." According to the Pareto Principle, generally speaking, 20% of your donors will account for 80% of your charitable income. But, as Damian O'Broin, founder of Ask Direct in Ireland, teaches, you should run the Pareto Principle twice. Because 20% of your first 20% (4% of your givers, in other words) will usually account for the bulk (64%) of the giving. That 4% deserve extraordinary attention.
 
Not all charities are equally compelling, as Rory and Beth Ann note. The more intimate and personal my connection to you (e.g., I sweated out my degree in your classrooms or you cured me in your surgical theater), the longer I'm likely to give. Beth Ann added this, "The rise of peer-to-peer giving shortens the lifespan of donors. They give to a 'charity' but are really usually only giving to their friends. This certainly has the great opportunity of casting a wide net, but the net is gossamer."

THANK YOU, ALL!!! 

Dear Male Fundraisers: Bacon-Wrapped Survey Needs Your Response TODAY  
¶ A SERIOUS piece of research is currently underway, conducted by the Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy. Men: please turn off the game, get off the couch, and TAKE THE DAMN SURVEY, OK? Of course, female fundraisers are encouraged to respond, too. But then, most of you women already did that, didn't you? Because of course you're the multi-tasking, responsible gender. The men? "I'll do it if it comes with pizza and a six-pack." GUYS: please do your duty. Make me proud like a peacock again. Thank you! 
Donor surveys, well explained. 
¶ Claire Axelrad, CFRE, lawyer and nonprofit coach, has a knack for getting everything you need to know about a topic into a single blog post. Now she's done it for donor surveys. I would guess that 99 out of 100 charities don't bother surveying their donors ... which means 99 out of 100 charities aren't wielding the most important relationship-building tool in the box. Don't let another year go by. Read this. 
HOT TIP for 2016 AFP Int'l: MQI case study might well be most profitable session at conference  
¶ Re: why charities swing toward foolish notions like "We need younger donors!", Lisa Sargent wrote me in January, "They know their losing donors. The problem is, they don't have a handle on their database - and so are making knee-jerk decisions over who's worth what, and across which channel. I can tell you in advance that we're squeezing a lot of this into our AFP presentation in March. Hard numbers, over seven years. I hope it will be a sign to boards/mgmt that they need to up their data game...and all the good stuff that can happen when they do." Lisa and Denisa Casement, the superb development chief at Merchants Quay Ireland (MQI), will reveal the data and choices behind 7 years of astounding fundraising growth.  
How sensory words light up the brain 
¶ I've long been an Ann Wylie devotee. She's a smooth, sharp writing coach bristling with insights. In this fascinating article referencing neuroscientific discoveries, Ann shows why descriptors (like smooth, sharp and bristling) light up your reader's sensory cortex ... while literal phrases don't. Enjoy this instant classic from Ann: you'll never write the same old, boring way again. 
Is "relationship fundraising" a street paved with gold? Landmark new report went deep to find the truth. Available free for your downloading.
¶ Should a fundraiser's pay be based on how she makes donors feel? YES! says this revolutionary report. And that's just one of many fascinating conclusions. Authored by researchers Ian MacQuillin, Adrian Sargeant and Jen Shang, and published by Rogare, the fundraising think tank at Plymouth University's Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy, this 4-volume report includes case studies from nonprofits like charity: water. Made possible by generous financial support from Bloomerang and Pursuant.
Storm warning! Oncoming Ahern speaking gigs

Thursday Feb 18 + Friday Feb 19 Two part online webinar: Writing a Fabulous Case for Support 

Part 1 - The Overview, Part 2 - The Weeds 
$199 for both, $99 for Part 1
only
---
San Antonio, TX: Thursday Feb 25
An afternoon of training for AFP San Antonio 
 
On the program, from 1:20 PM - 4:30 PM: (1) LOVERIZING, The Lucrative Difference A a Few Words Can Make; (2) Writing a Powerful Case Statement; and (3) Direct Mail for Small NGOs.     

OTHER appearances....
 
FEB 22 Bloomcom, Orlando, FL (SOLD OUT)
FEB 23 international webinar, AFP: Storytelling for Fundraisers: It Ain't All Bourbon and Whittlin' in Your Rocker
FEB 29 morning workshop donor newsletters, New London (CT) Library
MARCH 4, speaking, Economics Literacy annual conference, Atlanta 
Tom Ahern Donor Communications
 | a2bmail@aol.com | 401-398-8104 | www.aherncomm.com
10 Johnson Road, Foster, RI 02825 USA