We are also asking that our schools, and all classrooms, be rendered unconditionally safe.
This includes assessing and eliminating programs that may render young people vulnerable to those who employ grooming techniques. Parents of middle-school children need to know who their children are being allowed to communicate with and form relationships with, and they need to know what boundaries are being placed on conversations and instruction, and what sexually explicit material is being utilized. Unconditionally safe also means that schools don’t promote identity politics or signal that certain students are deserving of special considerations and protections due solely to the identity group to which they belong. Signalling that a classroom is safe for some students but not others is the antithesis of inclusion.
All classrooms should be physically safe spaces, and the things that render a classroom physically safe don't tend to discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity. If these spaces are supposed to be emotionally safe spaces, then it must be pointed out that many children are confused and disturbed by what is being presented to them in the context of SOGI 123.
Young children often don’t know how to react or respond when their teachers, who occupy a place of privilege and power, present to them controversial and sensitive topics, and it is clear that many educators are introducing highly sensitive topics while failing to properly assess the emotional safety of their students, their level of maturity, and their capacity to understand the subtle and sophisticated aspects of the topics being presented to them. It is also clear that some of these teachers are behaving more like activists than educators.
The requirement for schools to remain non-sectarian is to prevent schools from indoctrinating children – the goal being to educate them.
|