|
|
Our mission is to educate, engage, and mobilize citizens of the St. Croix Valley (Western Wisconsin and Eastern Minnesota) through grassroots efforts to affect the security, economic stability, and preservation of the Constitutional republic form of government.
A Voice for the Silent Majority
| |
|
ACTION ITEM
UPDATE #2
The Shame Event scheduled for Hudson Lakefront Park has been moved to the Hudson High School, 1501 Vine Street, Hudson, Wisconsin, June 22, 2024, scheduled from 10-4. Please attend to pray and take pictures and videos for potential violations of Wisconsin State Statutes 948.11 and 948.12. THIS IS A PUBLIC EVENT. Print out copies of Wisconsin State Statutes 948.11 and 948.12 (below) and See Something, Say Something. Take your information to any of the police officers on duty. There will also be "security" present, but the proper reporting authority will be the Hudson Police Department.
Click here for the signed agreement that was submitted by the Pride group to the Hudson School District for signature on June 20, 2024. According to the Hudson School District web site facility rental page: https://hudsonraiders.org/community/facility-rental/,
"...3. Complete and return both the Application for Use form and proof of liability insurance (Certificate of Liability Insurance) at least 3 weeks prior to the activity/event, but no more than 60 days in advance. Special circumstances may apply to Priority 2 requests that extend beyond 60 days which will be determined by the Assistant Director of Community Relations in coordination with the user and Community Education Specialist/Facility Scheduler. ..."
The Hudson High School Facility Rental agreement states the following is cause for termination (in part).
Wisconsin State Statute 948.11 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/11
Wisconsin State Statute 948.12 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/12
How is it a taxpayer-funded building is used for an "event" that could be promoting sodomy and sexual deviancy? Who approved this taxpayer-funded building to be used for this event? It this a private event or a public event? Can you think of any events that wouldn't be approved to be hosted at a taxpayer-funded building? Ask them what precautions will be conducted to be assured Wisconsin State Statutes 948.11 and 948.12 will not be violated?
Call/E-mail Nick Ouellette, Hudson School District, Superintendent: ouelletten@hudsonraiders.org, 715.377.3702
Call/E-mail Tim Miner, Superintendent Executive Administrative Assistant, minertr@hudsonraiders.org, 715-377-3702
Call/E-mail Michael Ballard, Hudson High School Principal: ballardmichael@hudsonraiders.org, 715-377-3800
Call/E-mail Josh Halvorson, Associate High School Principal: halvorjm@hudsonraiders.org, 715.377.3800; ext. 6003
Call/E-mail Andrea Sorensen, Associate High School Principal: sorensenandrea@hudsonraiders.org, 715.377.3800; 6002
Call/E-mail Aaron Moen, Associate High School Principal: moenap@hudsonraiders.org, 715.377.3714; ext. 8091
DEAN OF STUDENTS
- Andrew Bauschelt – 715.377.3800; ext. 6008
- Dana Krahenbuhl – 715.377.3800; ext. 6005
| |
|
Promotion of sodomy and sexual deviancy coming to Hudson, Wisconsin, June 22, Lakefront Park
Please review last year's Shame event information below. This year, June 22, 2024, Lakefront Park, Hudson, Wisconsin, the grooming and sexual deviancy continues with support from sponsors and vendors. At present, there is no mention of a drag queen being forced onto little children, guarded by the Hudson Police Department. Last year, the drag queen was taken off the schedule as an attempt to stop the criticism. But the drag queen showed up anyway, as we suspected would happen.
Pay attention to the Kids and Teen Tent. Please attend to pray and take pictures. The Wisconsin State Statutes Crimes Against Children are cited below.
Call the Hudson City Council to object to this promotion of sodomy event being held in Hudson. The Hudson City Council approved the permit by consent agenda, meaning there was no discussion but approved unanimously without comment February 5, 2024.
YouTube: Minute 4:50-5:50. Search the internet to find filthy pictures and videos of what goes on in "pride" parades.
Contacts for Hudson City Council.
| |
|
|
Read these Bible verses to the so-called "pastors" who prowl about the earth, seeking the ruin of souls:
Douay-Rheims Bible
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 If any one lie with a man as with a woman, both have committed an abomination, let them be put to death: their blood be upon them.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God.
Romans 1:26-30 For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents.
| |
|
CHAPTER 948
CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/11
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/12
948.12 Possession of child pornography.
(1m) Whoever possesses, or accesses in any way with the intent to view, any undeveloped film, photographic negative, photograph, motion picture, videotape, or other recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct under all of the following circumstances may be penalized under sub. (3):
(a) The person knows that he or she possesses or has accessed the material.
(b) The person knows, or reasonably should know, that the material that is possessed or accessed contains depictions of sexually explicit conduct.
(c) The person knows or reasonably should know that the child depicted in the material who is engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years.
(2m) Whoever exhibits or plays a recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct, if all of the following apply, may be penalized under sub. (3):
(a) The person knows that he or she has exhibited or played the recording.
(b) Before the person exhibited or played the recording, he or she knew the character and content of the sexually explicit conduct.
(c) Before the person exhibited or played the recording, he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct had not attained the age of 18 years.
(3) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a person who violates sub. (1m) or (2m) is guilty of a Class D felony.
(b) A person who violates sub. (1m) or (2m) is guilty of a Class I felony if the person is under 18 years of age when the offense occurs.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1995 a. 67; 2001 a. 16, 109; 2005 a. 433; 2011 a. 271.
A violation of this section must be based on the content of the photograph and how it was produced. Evidence of the location and manner of storing the photo are not properly considered. State v. A.H., 211 Wis. 2d 561, 566 N.W.2d 858 (Ct. App. 1997), 96-2311.
For purposes of multiplicity analysis, each image possessed can be prosecuted separately. Prosecution is not based upon the medium of reproduction. Multiple punishment is appropriate for a defendant who compiled and stored multiple images over time. State v. Multaler, 2002 WI 35, 252 Wis. 2d 54, 643 N.W.2d 437, 00-1846.
Criminalizing child pornography presents the risk of self-censorship of constitutionally protected material. Criminal responsibility may not be imposed without some element of scienter, the degree of knowledge that makes a person legally responsible for the consequences of his or her act or omission. In this section, “reasonably should know" is less than actual knowledge but still requires more than the standard used in civil negligence actions, which is constitutionally sufficient. State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164, 266 Wis. 2d 719, 668 N.W.2d 760, 01-2691.
There was sufficient evidence in the record to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly possessed the child pornography images on his computer because he repeatedly visited child pornography Web sites, clicked on thumbnail images to create larger pictures for viewing, accessed five images twice, and saved at least one image to his personal folder. State v. Lindgren, 2004 WI App 159, 275 Wis. 2d 851, 687 N.W.2d 60, 03-1868.
Sub. (1m) forbids only depictions of real children engaged in sexually explicit activity. Sub. (1m) (c) specifies that to be convicted under the statute, the person possessing the pornography must know or have reason to know that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years. This element does not speak of depictions at all, but rather of a child who has not attained the age of 18 years. State v. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26, 307 Wis. 2d 447, 746 N.W.2d 545, 06-3025.
Sub. (1m) criminalizes the knowing possession of any photograph of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Expert testimony or other evidence to establish the reality of apparently real photographs is not required. When there has been no evidence adduced that the photographs are anything other than what they appear to be, the photographs themselves are sufficient evidence of the reality of what they depict. State v. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26, 307 Wis. 2d 447, 746 N.W.2d 545, 06-3025.
Individuals who purposely view digital images of child pornography on the Internet, even though the images are not found in the person's computer hard drive, nonetheless knowingly possess those images in violation of sub. (1m). An individual knowingly possesses child pornography when he or she affirmatively pulls up images of child pornography on the Internet and views those images knowing that they contain child pornography. Whether the proof is hard drive evidence or something else should not matter. State v. Mercer, 2010 WI App 47, 324 Wis. 2d 506, 782 N.W.2d 125, 08-1763.
| |
| Showed up with Pride, overcame with joy | | Hudson joined the growing number of small cities and communities celebrating Pride on Saturday, June 17. | | |
Coming to your community?
| |
Sodom, Gomorrah and Hudson? |
A similar photo of a police officer standing "guard" has since been removed from the HPD's Facebook page. We have to ask ourselves: Who is he protecting? Compare the pictures.
| |
Click below for a full list | |
Vendors/Sponsors/Individuals of the Pride Fest |
Banner Vendors/Sponsors/Booths/Individuals (may not be a complete list)
Waystone Coffee Co.
Andre and Rachel Perkins
Trish and Duane Johnson
Lynette and Kurt Beinlich
Tyler Beinlich
CMK Energy
Jen Marty
Michelle Ioppolo
Susan Kattas
Tricia Christiansen
Pete and Laura Foster
Paulette Mergendahl
Hudson Hospital & Clinic
Hudson Physicians
Aaron Nelson
Fine Arts Council, New Richmond, WI
Megan, Tony, Hudson Green
The Bruch Family
The Purple Tree
Bennett's Chop & Railhouse
St. Croix County Democrats
Lana and Roy Sjoberg
Dick's Bar and Grill
Hudson Flower Shop
Bridget Mayer
| |
The drag queen's real name is Emerson Kellogg, aka Slaymantha Fox, Mr. Twin Cities Leather 2016.
Connecting the poisonous tentacles.
| | |
|
Call to Action
Will we protect the children?
| |
What do Disney, Target, Bud Light and many other “woke” corporations have in common? These corporations and others are enduring consumer boycotts with billions of dollars in profit losses. Could it be that We the People have finally had enough of the sexual deviancy that is LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ? Chest binders? Drag queens? Penis tuckers? Gender changes? Satanic designer promoting “homophobe headrest” guillotine jewelry pins?
Parents are confronting school boards throughout the nation, demanding their children be protected against pornography. Some of these parents are not even allowed to read out loud the grade school books loaded with pornography, yet, their children have access and are indoctrinated. Parents in North Hollywood are keeping their elementary children home from a pride event saying "Keep your kids home and innocent." Once seen and heard, pornography cannot be unseen and unheard.
On June 17, Hudson “Pride” Co is having an event at the Hudson (Wisconsin) Lakefront, with the promotion of the Hudson Chamber of Commerce. When questioned as to whether or not this event will have pornography available to children, either in written or drag queen form, there was no answer. Hudson Pride Co. has had fundraisers with drag queens in Minnesota, with names like “Slaymantha Fox, Daiquiri Defile” and other vile sexual deviants. What are they bringing to Hudson?
Will your pastor try to save souls from this deviant lifestyle? Can we save the children? Will we even try? We will all be held accountable. Please attend and take pictures and videos. Pray for them all!
Hudson Area Biblical pastors--Where are you?
Sodom, Gomorrah and Hudson?
CHAPTER 948
CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN
948.12 Possession of child pornography.
(1m) Whoever possesses, or accesses in any way with the intent to view, any undeveloped film, photographic negative, photograph, motion picture, videotape, or other recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct under all of the following circumstances may be penalized under sub. (3):
(a) The person knows that he or she possesses or has accessed the material.
(b) The person knows, or reasonably should know, that the material that is possessed or accessed contains depictions of sexually explicit conduct.
(c) The person knows or reasonably should know that the child depicted in the material who is engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years.
(2m) Whoever exhibits or plays a recording of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct, if all of the following apply, may be penalized under sub. (3):
(a) The person knows that he or she has exhibited or played the recording.
(b) Before the person exhibited or played the recording, he or she knew the character and content of the sexually explicit conduct.
(c) Before the person exhibited or played the recording, he or she knew or reasonably should have known that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct had not attained the age of 18 years.
(3) (a) Except as provided in par. (b), a person who violates sub. (1m) or (2m) is guilty of a Class D felony.
(b) A person who violates sub. (1m) or (2m) is guilty of a Class I felony if the person is under 18 years of age when the offense occurs.
A violation of this section must be based on the content of the photograph and how it was produced. Evidence of the location and manner of storing the photo are not properly considered. State v. A.H., 211 Wis. 2d 561, 566 N.W.2d 858 (Ct. App. 1997), 96-2311.
For purposes of multiplicity analysis, each image possessed can be prosecuted separately. Prosecution is not based upon the medium of reproduction. Multiple punishment is appropriate for a defendant who compiled and stored multiple images over time. State v. Multaler, 2002 WI 35, 252 Wis. 2d 54, 643 N.W.2d 437, 00-1846.
Criminalizing child pornography presents the risk of self-censorship of constitutionally protected material. Criminal responsibility may not be imposed without some element of scienter, the degree of knowledge that makes a person legally responsible for the consequences of his or her act or omission. In this section, “reasonably should know" is less than actual knowledge but still requires more than the standard used in civil negligence actions, which is constitutionally sufficient. State v. Schaefer, 2003 WI App 164, 266 Wis. 2d 719, 668 N.W.2d 760, 01-2691.
There was sufficient evidence in the record to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly possessed the child pornography images on his computer because he repeatedly visited child pornography Web sites, clicked on thumbnail images to create larger pictures for viewing, accessed five images twice, and saved at least one image to his personal folder. State v. Lindgren, 2004 WI App 159, 275 Wis. 2d 851, 687 N.W.2d 60, 03-1868.
Sub. (1m) forbids only depictions of real children engaged in sexually explicit activity. Sub. (1m) (c) specifies that to be convicted under the statute, the person possessing the pornography must know or have reason to know that the child engaged in sexually explicit conduct has not attained the age of 18 years. This element does not speak of depictions at all, but rather of a child who has not attained the age of 18 years. State v. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26, 307 Wis. 2d 447, 746 N.W.2d 545, 06-3025.
Sub. (1m) criminalizes the knowing possession of any photograph of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Expert testimony or other evidence to establish the reality of apparently real photographs is not required. When there has been no evidence adduced that the photographs are anything other than what they appear to be, the photographs themselves are sufficient evidence of the reality of what they depict. State v. Van Buren, 2008 WI App 26, 307 Wis. 2d 447, 746 N.W.2d 545, 06-3025.
Individuals who purposely view digital images of child pornography on the Internet, even though the images are not found in the person's computer hard drive, nonetheless knowingly possess those images in violation of sub. (1m). An individual knowingly possesses child pornography when he or she affirmatively pulls up images of child pornography on the Internet and views those images knowing that they contain child pornography. Whether the proof is hard drive evidence or something else should not matter. State v. Mercer, 2010 WI App 47, 324 Wis. 2d 506, 782 N.W.2d 125, 08-1763.
| |
Gender Confusion resources
“…In recent years, society has brought social and legislative approval to all types of sexual relationships that used to be considered sinful. Since the biblical vision of what it means to be human tells us that not every friendship or love can be expressed in sexual relations, the church’s teaching on these issues is now evidence of intolerance for what the civil law upholds and even imposes. What was once a request to live and let live has now become a demand for approval. The “ruling class,” those who shape public opinion in politics, in education, in communications, in entertainment, is using the civil law to impose its own form of morality on everyone. We are told that, even in marriage itself, there is no difference between men and women, although nature and our very bodies clearly evidence that men and women are not interchangeable at will in forming a family. Nevertheless, those who do not conform to the official religion, we are warned, place their citizenship in danger….”
| |
If you would like to donate to the Citizens for the St. Croix Valley, please mail your donation to PO Box 144, Star Prairie, WI 54026. Providing truthful information is our goal. If that's your goal, please consider helping us out. Thank you. | |
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke | |
| | | |
