“
Can there ever be an omnipresent spectre where directors prefer to avoid taking the risk of disagreeing with uber-intelligent machines? Or can we imagine a situation when AI developed artificial personnel are given a legal personality, and with that, the capacity to be appointed as directors?
Neither of these two scenarios seems plausible. This is because AI directors cannot be held accountable, whereas human directors will always have consciousness and a conscience, which makes them accountable.
As a risk management specialist, I perceive a link between potential accountability issues arising from utilization of artificial intelligence in corporate boardrooms and the danger of AI compromising directors' capacity for independent decision-making.
| |
The excerpt set out in the previous section is from the insightful response provided by our Managing Partner, Monish G Chatrath, while addressing the question of artificial intelligence's ('AI') role in improving corporate governance within boardrooms.
Monish had shared his perspectives at this afternoon's Panel Discussion, which was organized by the Institute of Internal Auditors, India, during their National Conference for 2024 in New Delhi today.
| |
It is clear and evident that AI is progressively marking its presence in corporate boardrooms. Traditionally, the decisions of boards of directors have depended on human judgment and experience, but now AI is being incorporated to improve the decision-making process. The following are some ways AI is influencing boardrooms:
-
Data-driven insights: AI is being used to analyze vast amounts of data to provide valuable insights to board members. With AI, boards can delve into vast troves of financial data, market trends and regulatory filings, while extracting actionable insights that can blend well with their personal intellect and experience, as they make strategic recommendations.
-
Stakeholder engagement: AI has transformed the way companies engage and communicate with their shareholders. AI-driven chatbots and virtual assistants enable corporations to interact with shareholders in real-time, swiftly addressing inquiries and delivering personalized information and services. This level of automation enhances transparency, accessibility, and responsiveness in shareholder communications, cultivating a sense of trust and bolstering confidence in the company's governance practices.
-
Risk management: AI-driven solutions have revolutionized corporate governance by their ability to analyze data from both internal and external sources. This empowers boards to identify emerging risks, analyze predictions of future trends and assess the potential impact of the same on a company's operations and financial performance. By leveraging predictive analytics and data-driven insights, companies can effectively manage risks, optimize resource allocation, and enhance decision-making processes. This positions them for long-term success in an ever-changing business landscape.
-
Decision support: Complex decisions demand intelligent systems. By combining machine learning, data science, and domain-specific knowledge, AI can provide recommendations for strategic choices, mergers, acquisitions and digital transformations. AI-powered analytics tools can assist boards in decision-making by providing data-driven insights and scenario analysis, facilitating well-informed decisions that are aligned with the company’s strategic objectives.
-
Compliance & Environmental, Social, and Governance (‘ESG’) Practices: AI can help boards stay compliant with regulations. It can analyze legal documents, track changes in laws, and ensure adherence to governance standard. With the rising importance of ESG factors in corporate decision-making, boards are exploring how AI can be used to enhance ESG practices. AI technologies are being applied to assess and manage environmental impact, improve diversity and inclusion efforts and strengthen corporate social responsibility initiatives.
| |
Simultaneously, AI introduces a range of unique risks and ethical issues such as these...
AI algorithms trained on historical data may perpetuate existing biases entrenched in societal norms. Consequently, organizations need to be vigilant in identifying and mitigating algorithmic biases to uphold principles of fairness & equity in AI-driven decision-making processes. At the same time, intellectual property rights may be at jeopardy if proprietary algorithms, software, or datasets are used in AI technology. To avoid disputes over ownership or violation of intellectual property rights, boards must address matters pertaining to the ownership, licensing, and protection of intellectual property linked with AI systems.
Secondly, unlike traditional human decision-making processes where the reasoning is transparent or can be elicited, AI algorithms operate as ‘black boxes’ making it difficult to understand the reasoning.
Thirdly, while the usage of integration of generative AI can produce novel ideas and solutions, these can also raise concerns about intellectual property rights, accountability, and the potential for unintended consequences. Confidentiality and security of sensitive corporate information must be top priority as there can be a risk of unintended disclosure or exposure of confidential information (especially since AI systems process and retain user interactions as training data).
Fourthly, since AI systems often rely on vast amounts of data, including sensitive information about employees, customers, and stakeholders, boards must ensure compliance with data protection laws to avoid potential fines and legal liabilities resulting from data breaches or misuse of personal data.
| |
In summary
The regulatory landscape surrounding AI technologies is rapidly evolving, with new regulations and guidelines being proposed and implemented by governments and regulatory bodies worldwide. Boards must stay abreast of regulatory developments and anticipate changes in the legal framework governing AI to adapt their governance practices and ensure ongoing compliance.
While AI offers immense benefits, it is essential to address its limitations and ethical implications. Businesses and individuals must weigh the pros and cons carefully when adopting AI technology.
Should you require any clarifications or assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at contactus@mgcglobal.co.in.
Best regards,
Markets Team
MGC Global Risk Advisory
| |
About MGC Global Risk Advisory
MGC Global Risk Advisory LLP, an independent member firm of Allinial Global, has been recognized as one of the '10 most promising risk advisory services firms' in 2017, 'Company of the Year' in 2018 and 2019, one of the 'Top Exceptional Companies to Work For' in 2020, among the 'Top 25 Customer Centric Companies' in 2020, 'Consultant of the Year' in 2021, 'Top Exceptional Leaders in Risk Advisory Services' in 2023, and 'Best Place to Work' in 2024.
MGC Global offers services in enterprise-wide risk management, forensics, internal audits, control assessments (SOC, IFCR & SOX), process re-engineering, privacy & data protection (including GDPR & DPDP), IT risk advisory, VAPT, ISO readiness, cybersecurity, vCISO, accounting advisory, forensics, ESG, and CSR services.
Our firm is equipped to serve its clients through its offices in Bengaluru, Mumbai, NCR & has service arrangements with associate firms in all major cities in India.
| | |
About Allinial Global
Allinial Global, previously known as PKF North America, is the world's second-largest member-based association at present.
It has collective revenues of approximately US$ 6 billion and has been committed to the success of independent accounting and consulting firms since 1969.
The association currently encompasses member firms in over 105 countries, with more than 28,000 professional staff and over 6,000 partners working out of nearly 700 offices worldwide.
Allinial Global equips its member firms with a wide range of resources and support, benefiting both the firms and their clients in crucial areas such as learning and development, human resources, international outreach, technical support, and knowledge-sharing through specialized communities of practice, as well as information technology and practice management.
| | | | | |